Theodicy

A rugged wooden cross stands tall amidst a debris field, its weathered surface illuminated by shafts of golden light piercing through a tattered tarp canopy. the cross is the only structure still standing.

When the Storm Comes: Is God Sovereign or Just a Spectator?

This is a topical sermon using a hurricane disaster to address theodicy. While commendable for its emphasis on mercy ministry, it commits three primary theological errors: it explicitly denies God's sovereignty over natural disasters, functionally redefines God's presence as synonymous with community action, and grounds the believer's hope in an act of human will rather than divine grace. The result is a sermon that promotes a Social Gospel and a limited, reactive God, rather than the sovereign Lord of Scripture.

Read MoreWhen the Storm Comes: Is God Sovereign or Just a Spectator?
A flickering candle in a dark cavern, its meager light illuminating a distant chisel slowly shaping a crude stone block into a finer form.

When the Answer to ‘Why?’ Isn’t ‘Do’: A Review of ‘Morning Sermon’

The sermon is pastorally sensitive and orthodox in its liturgical framework, correctly rejecting the notion that God punishes people with natural disasters. However, its core theological engine is weak. It addresses the problem of theodicy from Romans 8 but fails to land on the chapter's conclusion of eschatological hope. Instead, it substitutes a moralistic imperative ('How can I help?'), effectively replacing theology with ethics as the solution to suffering. This represents a significant homiletical and theological weakness, characteristic of a Sardis condition: the form of religion is present, but the power of the gospel is muted.

Read MoreWhen the Answer to ‘Why?’ Isn’t ‘Do’: A Review of ‘Morning Sermon’
A lush wheat field sways gently in the breeze, its golden stalks brushing against the tall, spindly weeds that have begun to overtake it. in the distance, a clear stream flows through the countryside, its waters shimmering in the morning light.

The Wheat, The Weeds, and The Will: Why ‘Choosing Life’ Isn’t Enough

The sermon attempts to provide a pastoral answer to the problem of theodicy using the Parable of the Wheat and Weeds. Commendably, it encourages lament and proper biblical reconciliation. However, its theological core is weak, resolving the problem with a synergistic appeal to human will ('Choose life') detached from the doctrine of regeneration. The Christological connection is moralistic, and a claim to subjective divine guidance ('God told me to speak') further weakens its foundation. The result is a well-intentioned but anemic message that preaches the law's demands without the Gospel's power.

Read MoreThe Wheat, The Weeds, and The Will: Why ‘Choosing Life’ Isn’t Enough
A shattered mirror reflects fragmented, distorted images in a dimly lit room, the cracks casting eerie shadows on the walls.

When Comforting the Hurting Compromises the God Who Saves

This topical sermon on suffering demonstrates a commendable pastoral heart but is built on a critically flawed theological foundation. By explicitly rejecting divine 'predeterminism' in favor of human 'free will' and by asserting that not all events are God's will, the sermon functionally denies God's exhaustive sovereignty and promotes a synergistic view of salvation. Furthermore, the observance of Communion without fencing the table represents a serious liturgical and ecclesiological failure. The low ratio of Scripture to commentary leaves the congregation with human reasoning rather than the Word of God as its primary source of comfort.

Read MoreWhen Comforting the Hurting Compromises the God Who Saves
A weathered stone archway, overgrown with creeping vines, frames a distant vista of rolling hills shrouded in fog. the arch crumbles slightly at the edges, hinting at the passage of time and the inevitable decay of all earthly structures. a shaft of golden light pierces the mist, illuminating the archway and casting long shadows across the landscape. the light seems to eelementate from the very heart of the fog itself, suggesting a hidden source of hope and redemption, even amidst the bleakness of the scene.

Theological Review: ‘The Power of Forgiveness’ by Toni Ruth Smith

The sermon attempts to tackle the problem of evil but does so by denying God's meticulous providence and affirming a synergistic view of salvation. This foundational error, coupled with an Open Communion practice and a very low text-to-talk ratio, presents a significant departure from biblical orthodoxy.

Read MoreTheological Review: ‘The Power of Forgiveness’ by Toni Ruth Smith
A shattered mirror, its pieces scattered across a dark wooden table. a single shaft of golden light illuminates a single, intact shard. the light dances across the broken pieces, casting fractured reflections on the walls.

When Pain Becomes a Stumbling Block: A Review of ‘The Power of the Holy Spirit’

The sermon is fundamentally flawed by two primary errors: 1) An explicit denial of God's sovereignty over pain and suffering, attributing all such events solely to Satan. 2) An imprecise and dangerous statement that 'Jesus went to hell so we wouldn't have to go there,' which echoes the 'Jesus Died Spiritually' heresy. These errors undermine the doctrines of God's providence and the sufficiency of Christ's work on the cross.

Read MoreWhen Pain Becomes a Stumbling Block: A Review of ‘The Power of the Holy Spirit’